Wade

Wade v. Gilliland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20203:10-cv-00425California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Elroy K. WADE, Plaintiff, No. C 10-00425 WHA

v.

WOODY GILLILAND, in his individual ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S capacity; WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, in his MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 14 individual capacity; GEORGIA MARTIN, in INJUNCTION her individual capacity; ALICE YOUNG, in her individual capacity; SARAH NELSON, in her individual capacity; KATHYANN BATISTE, in her individual capacity; and BERLENE ROBERTS, in her individual capacity, 18 Defendants.

20 Pro se plaintiff Elroy K. Wade, a vexatious litigant, has yet again filed a motion for preliminary injunction challenging the imposition of his 2010 pre-filing order as unconstitutional and invalid after this Court denied an identical challenge in 2019. The history of Wade’s repetitive litigation in this district which culminated in two different rulings from Judge Charles Breyer and the undersigned judge declaring Wade a vexatious litigant is described in detail in a prior order (see Dkt. No. 99). In brief, Wade filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.