Castillo-Antonio

Castillo-Antonio v. Kang

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20203:20-cv-01810California785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO, Case No. 20-cv-01810-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

v. SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND

COMPLAINT

JAMES H. KANG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 11.) Plaintiff seeks default against Defendants James H. Kang dba Food Mart dba Food Barn and Eastgate Enterprise, Inc., In deciding whether to grant or deny a motion for default judgment, the Court must assess whether the defendant against whom default judgment is sought was properly served with notice of the action. See Penpower Tech. Ltd. v. S.P.C. Tech., 627 F. Supp. 2d 1083, 1088 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Upon review of Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and the proofs of service of the summons and complaint, the Court has concerns regarding whether on Defendant Eastgate Enterprise, Inc. was properly served in this matter. “A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.