Andrew C. v. Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 ANDREW C. AND ROBERT C., Case No.: 17-CV-2072-YGR 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND DENYING v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION 11 ORACLE AMERICA INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFIT Dkt. Nos. 70, 71 12 PLAN, UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, et. al. 13 Defendants. 14 Presently before the Court are cross-motions for judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for health 16 benefits under a plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 17 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. filed by plaintiffs Andrew C. and Robert C. (Dkt. No. 70) and defendants 18 Oracle America Inc. Flexible Benefit Plan and United Healthcare Insurance Company (Dkt. No. 19 71). 20 Having considered the parties’ briefing and the complete administrative record,1 the Court 21 GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion for judgment pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil 22 Procedure on plaintiffs’ claim for health benefits and DENIES defendant’s cross-motion on that 23 claim.2 24