Gloria Rodriguez v. Comcast Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20203:16-cv-04413California6,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA RODRIGUEZ,

Case No. 16-cv-04413-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY COMCAST INC., et al., JUDGMENT ON REMAND 10 Defendants. Regarding Docket No. 29

Defendant Comcast Communications Management LLC (“Comcast”) filed a motion for summary judgment. The Court addressed and granted summary judgment on some, but not all, of the issues raised. On remand, the Court now considers the remaining issues raised in Comcast’s motion for summary judgment. Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Comcast’s motion for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Employment at Comcast. Plaintiff worked as a customer service representative for Comcast until Comcast terminated her employment on December 15,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.