Erceg

Erceg v. LendingClub Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20204:20-cv-01153California4,152 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LUKA ERCEG, Case No. 20-cv-01153-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. STAY AND MOTION TO DISMISS

LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 30 Defendant.

12 Defendant LendingClub Corporation (“LendingClub” or “Defendant”) moves to stay the pending action, or alternatively to dismiss (“Mot.,” Dkt. No. 30) the first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 27 (“FAC”)). Briefing on the motion is complete. Dkt. No. 34 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 35 (“Reply”). Plaintiff Luka Erceg (“Plaintiff”) alleges three causes of action: violations of (1) California Penal Code § 632;1 (2) California Penal Code § 632.7; and (3) Mass. Gen. Law. Ch. 272 § 99. See FAC ¶¶ 51, 63, 75. On July 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the motions. Dkt. No. 37. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that in the course of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.