Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20205:19-cv-01692California2,566 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 UNILOC USA, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-01692-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. APPLE'S DOCUMENT REQUESTS

NOS. 103-106

APPLE INC, Re: Dkt. No. 124 Defendant.

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc Luxembourg S.A., and Uniloc 2017 LLC’s (collectively, “Uniloc”) objections to defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) requests for production of documents. Dkt. No. 124. The Court held a hearing on this matter on July 14, 2020. Dkt. Nos. 129, 134. Having considered the parties’ submissions and oral argument during the hearing, the Court concludes that Uniloc must produce documents responsive to the disputed document requests, as narrowed by the Court. I. BACKGROUND The asserted patent in this case, U.S. Patent No. 7,587,207 (“the ’207 patent”), originally was owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.