Celinda Vazquez v. Joes Market

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20203:18-cv-07817California2,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CELINDA VAZQUEZ, Case No. 18-cv-07817-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; SETTING FURTHER

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JOES MARKET, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendants.

12 On June 29, 2020, plaintiff Celinda Vazquez filed a motion for summary judgment arguing there are no material issues of fact regarding her disability access claims against Joe’s Market, Nageeb Alnagar, and Halima Alnagar (collectively “defendants”). Defendants did not file an opposition. The motion is scheduled for a hearing on July 31, 2020. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter it suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion and schedules a further case management conference for October 16, 2020 at 3:30 p.m. 20 BACKGROUND On November 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.