Love

Love v. Barcelino Continental Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20203:19-cv-06684California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-06684-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; DEFENDANT’S COUNTER-MOTION BARCELINO CONTINENTAL CORP., AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S

FEES

Defendant.

This is an Americans with Disabilities (ADA) access case. Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendant to schedule a video settlement conference to “allow the case to move forward.” (Dkt. No. 22 at 2.) Defendant contends that Plaintiff’s motion violates the Court’s deadline that parties meet for a settlement conference by July 1, 2020, and that Plaintiff has demonstrated a “continued failure to reasonably respond to [Defendant’s] efforts to address” the case’s merits. (Dkt. No. 24 at 3-4.) Defendant moves this Court to lift any stay under the Northern District of California’s General Order 56 prohibiting Defendant from filing a motion for summary judgment, and renews its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.