State of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20204:19-cv-04975California15,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04975-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART,

DENYING IN PART, AND DEFERRING

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND RULING IN PART ON MOTION TO SECURITY, et al., DISMISS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 160

13 Before the court is defendants the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”), Chad Wolf,1 and Kenneth Cuccinelli’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND This case involves a challenge to the implementation of the final rule entitled “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds,” published by DHS on August 14, 2019. See Inadmissibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.