Harris

Harris v. Bullard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20204:19-cv-06648California737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZACKARY T. HARRIS, Case No. 19-cv-06648-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING THIRD REQUEST

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

v. SUA SPONTE GRANTING FOURTH

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

BRENDEN BULLARD, et al., SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, has filed the instant pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has recently filed a letter and declaration with the Court alleging that he has been denied access to his legal materials and the law library, and requesting appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 26. For the reasons set forth below, the Court sua sponte GRANTS plaintiff an extension of time to September 18, 2020, to file his second amended complaint, and DENIES the request for appointment of counsel. BACKGROUND On January 21, 2020, the Court dismissed the amended complaint with leave to amend …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.