Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Ruckus Wireless Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al., Case Nos. 16-cv-00186-SI, 16-cv-00558- SI, 16-cv-00624-SI, 16-cv-00897-SI Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 144, 146

12 Before the Court are defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. No. 144 (Defs’ ‘760 MSJ); Dkt. No. 146 (Defs’ ’825 MSJ). Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court hereby GRANTS both motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. 16 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Chrimar Systems Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company LLC (collectively, “Chrimar”) filed patent infringement actions against Juniper Networks Inc. (“Juniper”), Ruckus Wireless Inc. (“Ruckus”), Netgear Inc. (“Netgear”), and Fortinet Inc. (“Fortinet”) (collectively, “defendants”) on July 1, 2015, in the Eastern District of Texas. See Dkt. No. 1 (Complaint). The complaint alleged…