Saperstein
Saperstein v. Thomas P. Gohagan & Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 GUY SAPERSTEIN, Case No. 20-cv-03143-JCS
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
v. 6 Re: Dkt. No. 10 THOMAS P. GOHAGAN & COMPANY, et al., 8 Defendants.
9 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Guy Saperstein brings a putative class action against Defendant Thomas P. Gohagan & Company (“Gohagan”), asserting claims of breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. Saperstein initially named Travel Guard Americas, LLC as a second defendant, but dismissed all claims against that party without prejudice on May 19, 2020. Defendant Gohagan brings a motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the proceeding based on an arbitration provision in the trip reservation form between Saperstein and Gohagan. The Court finds that the motion is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and…