Khan

Khan v. City of Pinole Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20204:19-cv-06316California321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 DAVID KHAN, ET. AL., CASE No. 4:19-cv-06316-YGR Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT REFERRAL

vs. NOTICE CITY OF PINOLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET. Re: Dkt. No. 63 AL., Defendants. 9 On July 2, 2020, the Court issued its Order which, as relevant here, granted defendants’ motions to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 60.) On that same day, plaintiff David Khan filed a Notice of Appeal from the Court’s July 2, 2020 Order. (Dkt. No. 61.) On July 14, 2020, the Ninth Circuit || referred the matter to this Court for a determination of whether Khan’s in forma pauperis (‘IFP’’) || status should continue for this appeal. (Dkt. No. 63.) This Court determines that it should not. There are no valid grounds on which an appeal || can be based. Consequently, the Court certifies that any appeal taken from its July 2, 2020 Order || will not be taken in good faith and is therefore frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. Z…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.