Schulz

Schulz v. Bay Area Motivate, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:19-cv-02134California3,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN SCHULZ, Case No. 19-cv-02134-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

BAY AREA MOTIVATE, LLC, et al., Re: Doc. No. 25 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is the "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6)," filed January 27, 2020, on behalf of defendants Bay Area Motivate, LLC ("Motivate LLC"), Motivate International, Inc. ("Motivate Inc."), and Lyft, Inc. ("Lyft") (collectively, "Motivate Defendants"), as well as on behalf of defendants Metropolitan Transportation Commission ("MTC") and City and County of San Francisco ("San Francisco"). Plaintiff John Schulz ("Schulz") has filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 In the instant action, Schulz, who uses a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.