Chung
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20204:19-cv-07562California9,848 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT,
WILSON CHUNG, et al., MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A
Defendants. PROTECTIVE ORDER LIMITING
DISCOVERY, AND MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. Nos. 92, 93, 110, 114, 115, 118
Before the court are defendants Plantronics Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) and Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) combined motion to dismiss and strike (Dkt. 114) and motion to stay discovery or, in the alternative, for a protective order (Dkt. 92), defendant Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 115) and joinder to Plantronics’ motion to stay (Dkt. 99), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 118) and joinder to Plantronics’ motion to stay (Dkt. 100) (collectively, “defendants”). Also before …