Chung

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20204:19-cv-07562California9,848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT,

WILSON CHUNG, et al., MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY OR,

IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A

Defendants. PROTECTIVE ORDER LIMITING

DISCOVERY, AND MOTION FOR

ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 92, 93, 110, 114, 115, 118

Before the court are defendants Plantronics Inc.’s (“Plantronics” or “Poly”) and Thomas Puorro’s (“Puorro”) combined motion to dismiss and strike (Dkt. 114) and motion to stay discovery or, in the alternative, for a protective order (Dkt. 92), defendant Wilson Chung Ph.D.’s (“Chung”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 115) and joinder to Plantronics’ motion to stay (Dkt. 99), and defendant James He’s (“He”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 118) and joinder to Plantronics’ motion to stay (Dkt. 100) (collectively, “defendants”). Also before …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.