Floyd

Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20203:20-cv-01520California2,386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

LOUIS FLOYD, Case No. 20-CV-01520-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

RENEWED MOTION FOR

v.

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

SARATOGA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Louis Floyd (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Defendants Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc. (“Saratoga”) and its Chief Executive Officer Thomas Pallone (“Pallone”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for alternative service upon Saratoga and request that the Court find service of process on Pallone sufficient. ECF No. 23 (“Renewed Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to serve process on Saratoga via the California Secretary of State and GRANTS Plaintiff’s request that the Court find service of process on Pallone sufficient. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 27 Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.