Treasure Island Former and Current Residents v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:20-cv-01328California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TREASURE ISLAND FORMER AND Case No. 20-cv-01328-JD CURRENT RESIDENTS, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 18, 19, 22

TREASURE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants.

The Court finds the pending motions to dismiss to be suitable for decision without oral argument, see Civil L.R. 7-1(b), and resolves them on the papers. Dkt. Nos. 17, 18, 19, 22. Defendant One Treasure Island’s request to dismiss the complaint on the basis of a pre- filing order against plaintiffs is denied. Dkt. No. 18. The order required plaintiffs Patterson and Sample to obtain leave of court before “filing any new action against persons who are officers, agents, or employees of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco, A Corporation Sole or Catholic Charities CYO.” Patterson v. Goncalves, Case No. 14-cv-1311-CRB, Dkt. No. 26 at 9 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2014) (“Patterson order”). The amended complaint in this case does not name the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.