Avenmarg
Avenmarg v. Humboldt County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 DEBRA AVENMARG, Case No. 19-cv-05891-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON DEFENDANT
v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY'S SECOND
MOTION TO DISMISS
HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court is a Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 61) filed by Defendant Humboldt County seeking dismissal from Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 57-1, 57-2 *SEALED*)1 without further leave to amend. Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 63), and the County has replied (dkt. 66). For the reasons stated below, Defendant County’s motion is granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (dkts. 42, 43 *SEALED*)2 (“FAC”) contained allegations that Defendant County and Blanck violated her right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment, right to familial association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, right to petition under the First…