Whitall

Whitall v. Palomares

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20203:20-cv-01441California263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL, G43090, Case No. 20-cv-01441-CRB (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 7) S. PALOMARES, et al., ll Defendant(s). On July 1, 2020, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, within 28 || days, “to allege a possible Fourth Amendment and/or retaliation claim under § 1983 against the S individual correctional officers, if he can.” On July 17, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for “an extension of time until December 28, z 16 || 2020” to file an amended complaint so he can exhaust available administrative remedies as to his || Fourth Amendment and retaliation claims. ECF No. 7 at 1. Alternatively, he seeks a “voluntary 18 || dismissal... without prejudice to filing a new complaint with the added claims of retaliation and || illegal search and seizure.” Id. at 2. Plaintiffs motion for a lengthy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.