White
White v. PayPal, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TODD WHITE, Case No.19-cv-08015-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
PAYPAL, INC., Defendant.
12 More than five months have passed since I dismissed pro se plaintiff Todd White’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although I was skeptical that he could amend his complaint to plausibly bring claims within this court’s jurisdiction, I allowed him leave to amend his complaint. Nothing has been filed to date. For the reasons set forth below, I DISMISS this case, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. BACKGROUND On December 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu issued an order to show cause as to why White’s complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because his complaint only alleged state law claims that did not give rise to federal question jurisdiction and failed to establish the existence of diversity…