Wilson
Wilson v. City of Walnut Creek
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON, Case No. 20-cv-02721-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants.
13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve new defendants. On April 20, 2020, plaintiff filed his initial complaint. Dkt. 1. After the court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on June 10, 2020. Dkt. 12. On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” Dkt. 24) and the pending motion to add new defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d), Dkt. 25. The court then ordered defendants to file a response to the present motion as well as a responsive pleading or motion to dismiss the FAC. Dkt. 30. Plaintiff moves the court to serve his FAC on the new defendants that he names in the FAC pursuant to Rule 15(d). Dkt. 25 at 1. Federal Rule of…