CZ Services, Inc. v. Express Scripts Holding Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20203:18-cv-04217California6,506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CZ SERVICES, INC., et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-04217-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE EXPERT WITNESS

v. MOTIONS, MOTION TO STRIKE,

AND DISCOVERY

EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 241, 243, 246, 247, 303, 332 11 Defendants.

12 This order resolves the parties’ motions to exclude expert witnesses, Dkt. Nos. 241, 243, 246, 247, and ESI’s related motion to strike, Dkt. No. 303. It also addresses a letter from ESI about developments in the ownership of CZ Pharmacies. Dkt. No. 332. Detailed statements about the parties, claims, and salient facts are presented in the Court’s orders on the TRO application, transfer of venue, and summary judgment. See Dkt. Nos. 57, 92, 333. In keeping with the prior orders, this order refers to plaintiffs as “CZ Pharmacies.” Together with Care Zone Inc. (“CareZone”) and Jonathan Schwartz, they are counterclaim-defendants in this case. Defendants are “ESI.” The parties’ familiarity with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.