Adam

Adam v. Barone

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20203:20-cv-00761California6,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CINDY ADAM, Case No. 20-cv-00761-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v. TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1404(a) OR, IN THE FRANK V. BARONE, et al., ALTERNATIVE, TO DISMISS Defendants. Docket Nos. 35,

12 I. INTRODUCTION This lawsuit pertains to an alleged fraudulent scheme in which beauty products are advertised as “free samples,” but consumers are later inconspicuously charged for monthly subscriptions. Plaintiff Cindy Adam filed the operative First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 33, “FAC”) against the following defendants: Frank V. Barone, Kirill Chumenko, Green Pogo LLC (Delaware), Green Pogo LLC (New Jersey), Fortera Nutra Solutions LLC, Improved Nutraceuticals LLC, Natural Beauty Line LLC., Vegan Beauty LLC, Advanced Beauty LLC, Kurt Ellis, and SFLG Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). Pending before the Court is Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.