Brooke

Brooke v. Rihh LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20203:19-cv-06852California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 19-cv-06852-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v. NO.

RIHH LP, Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendant.

12 Now pending before the Court is the parties’ first joint discovery dispute letter. Docket No. 34. In the letter, plaintiff Theresa Brooke requests defendant RIHH, LP (“RIHH”) produce the construction and alteration history of the hotel at the heart of this dispute. Id. RIHH argues it need not produce any construction or alteration documents because it does not dispute liability on the basis of any alteration or construction history. Id. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s request for production. 19 BACKGROUND Ms. Brooke, a resident of Arizona, brought this Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) access action against RIHH, the owner and operator of the Residence Inn Livermore Pleasanton in Livermore,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.