Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20205:18-cv-03972California1,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 18-03972 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR

v. CLAIMS AGAINST NEWLY

NAMED DEFENDANTS; OF

CARLOS BOLANOS, et al., DISMISSAL

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 16, 2019, the Court found the second amended 19 complaint, liberally construed, stated cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against 20 Defendant Sheriff Arqueza of San Mateo County. Dkt. No. 27 at 2-3. Plaintiff then filed 21 a third amended complaint on March 5, 2020. Dkt. No. 32. The Court granted leave to 22 amend the claims against Defendant Arqueza under the Fourteenth Amendment, but did 23 not address claims against newly named defendants, the Sheriff of San Mateo County and 24 the City of Redwood City. Dkt. No. 34. The Court will herein screen the third amended 25 complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.