Lenk
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 KENNETH LENK, Case No. 19-cv-03791-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
INCORPORATED; MAURICE PROCEDURE
SCIAMMAS; AND SACKS, RICKETTS, AND CASE LLP, [Re: ECF 72] 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Kenneth Lenk’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 (“Rule 59 Motion”). See Rule 59 Motion, ECF 72. Two oppositions have been filed, one by Defendants Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”) and Maurice Sciammas, and the other by Defendant Sacks, Rickets and Case LLP (“SRC”). See MPS Opp., ECF 77; SRC Opp., ECF 76. Plaintiff has filed a reply. See Reply, ECF 78. The Rule 59 Motion was not noticed for hearing, and the Court finds it suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). …