Komaiko

Komaiko v. Baker Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20204:19-cv-03795California2,708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD KOMAIKO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03795-DMR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 19-3795 BAKER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

Plaintiffs Richard Komaiko and Marcie Cooperman are named representatives in this putative class action against Defendant Baker Technologies, Inc. (“Baker”). [Docket No. 29 (“FAC”).] Plaintiffs assert claims for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. (“TCPA”) and California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. (“UCL”). Baker moves to stay the case pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings in Barr v. American Ass’n of Political Consultants, Sup. Ct. Docket No. 19-631 (“Political Consultants”) and Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, Sup. Ct. Docket No. 19-511 (“Duguid”). [Docket Nos. 56 (“Mot.”), 70 (“Reply”).] Plaintiffs oppose. [Docket No. 67 (“Opp.”).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.