Saunders

Saunders v. Sunrun, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20204:19-cv-04548California4,632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS SAUNDERS, Case No. 19-cv-04548-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS, DENYING MOTION TO

v. STAY, AND AWARDING COSTS

SUNRUN, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant.

Defendant Sunrun, Inc. (“Sunrun”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Curtis Saunders’s class action complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), or in the alternative to stay the case pending payment of costs pursuant to Rule 41(d). Dkt. No. 31 (“Mot.”). Briefing on the motion is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 38 (“Opp.”), 42 (“Reply”). Plaintiff alleges two causes of action: violations of (1) the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq.; and (2) the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal. Pen. Code § 632.7. Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ¶¶ 3, 6. For the reasons articulated below, the Court AWARDS costs, DENIES Defendant’s motions to dismiss the Complaint, DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.