Babu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ASHOK BABU, and others, Case No. 18-cv-07677-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE; GRANTING v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND GREGORY J. AHERN, and others, Re: Dkt. Nos. 149, 173 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court are two motions: (1) a motion to intervene by the plaintiffs in Gonzalez et al. v. Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, Case No. 19-cv-07423-JSC, and (2) a motion for leave to amend the complaint by plaintiff Ashok Babu. The Court finds that intervention is not required and DENIES the Gonzalez plaintiffs’ motion to intervene. Because Defendants do not oppose, the Court also GRANTS Babu’s motion for leave to amend. Each motion is discussed in turn below. I. Motion to Intervene Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) permits intervention as a matter of right when the applicant “claims an interest relating to…