Cooper

Cooper v. Curallux LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20204:20-cv-02455California5,800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANICE COOPER, Case No. 20-cv-02455-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

CURALLUX LLC, DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 31

13 Before the court is defendant Curallux LLC’s (“Curallux” or “defendant”) motion to dismiss and motion to strike. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Janice Cooper (“plaintiff”) filed this putative class action against defendant on April 10, 2020 asserting claims for (1) violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq.; (2) violation of the California False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 et seq.;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.