Brooke
Brooke v. Patel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THERESA BROOKE, Case No.20-cv-02758-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 9 PRAFUL C. PATEL, «414 Defendant.
16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that Z no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this |! action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian |! Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: August 17, 2020 hee—~ 7 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States…