Breathe Technologies, Inc. v. New Aera, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20205:19-cv-07691California4,330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

BREATHE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Case No. 5:19-cv-07691-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 10 NEW AERA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 56 11 Defendants.

13 Before the Court is Defendant Inogen, Inc. (“Inogen”) and Defendant Todd W. Allum’s Motion to Dismiss, Compel Arbitration, and Stay. Dkt. No. 56 (“Motion to Compel”). Defendant Silverbow Development LLC (“Silverbow,” and collectively with Inogen and Allum, “Defendants”) filed a Joinder in the Motion as well as a separate Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 55 (“Silverbow Motion to Dismiss”). Plaintiff Breathe Technologies, Inc. (“Breathe” or “Plaintiff”) opposes both motions. Dkt. Nos. 59, 60. The Court took the matter under submission for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.