Hanks

Zendar Inc. v. Hanks

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20204:20-cv-03391California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZENDAR INC., Case No. 20-cv-03391-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S

ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS AND

v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DOCUMENTS SHOULD REMAIN

CHRISTOPHER HANKS, UNDER SEAL Defendant.

12 Between July 29, 2020 and August 10, 2020, the Court received four additional 13 submissions from Defendant, which shall be entered onto the docket after this Order is filed. The 14 Court has considered the document dated July 24, 2020, Defendant entitled “request for damages” 15 as a supplemental opposition brief to the motion to enforce, although it was filed one day after the 16 deadline to file an opposition. However, the rest of these documents were submitted well after his 17 opposition was due and after Plaintiff filed its reply, and the briefing on the motion to enforce was 18 closed. 19 Although Defendant is pro se, he is expected to follow the same rules of procedure that 20 govern other litigants. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.