Tahir

Tahir v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20204:18-cv-03675California7,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYED ABU TAHIR, Case No. 18-cv-03675-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NANCY A. BERRYHILL, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 24,

12 The former Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), Nancy A. Berryhill (“Defendant”), acting in her official capacity, denied Plaintiff Syed Abu Tahir’s (“Plaintiff”) application for Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). See 42 U.S.C § 423(d)(1)(A); Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff seeks judicial review of that decision. See Dkt. No. 1. On February 2, 2019, Defendant filed a transcript of the administrative record with the Court. See Dkt. No. 17 (“AR”). Plaintiff filed his motion for summary judgment on June 10, 2019. See Dkt. No. 23 (“Pl. Mot.”). Andrew Saul, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.