Maxwell

Maxwell v. Kaylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20205:19-cv-07832California7,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MICHAEL MAXWELL, Case No. 19-CV-07832-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 ROY KAYLOR, et al., Defendants. 17 Note: Plaintiff has requested an accommodation for his visual handicap “that requires 18 larger and bold type fonts.” Compl. at 1. The Court will file as an exhibit to the instant order a copy of the order that uses larger type and bold fonts.

20 Plaintiff Michael Maxwell (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant lawsuit against Defendants Roy 21 Kaylor, Jr., Cindia Boyle, Amanda Edmondson, and Andrew Pierce. Because Plaintiff failed to 22 serve Edmondson and Boyle, the Court dismissed Boyle and Edmondson from the case on July 15, 23 2020. ECF No. 58. Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by the remaining Defendants, 24 Kaylor and Pierce (collectively, “Defendants”). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant 25 law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.