Maxwell
Maxwell v. Kaylor
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
MICHAEL MAXWELL, Case No. 19-CV-07832-LHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 ROY KAYLOR, et al., Defendants. 17 Note: Plaintiff has requested an accommodation for his visual handicap “that requires 18 larger and bold type fonts.” Compl. at 1. The Court will file as an exhibit to the instant order a copy of the order that uses larger type and bold fonts.
20 Plaintiff Michael Maxwell (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant lawsuit against Defendants Roy 21 Kaylor, Jr., Cindia Boyle, Amanda Edmondson, and Andrew Pierce. Because Plaintiff failed to 22 serve Edmondson and Boyle, the Court dismissed Boyle and Edmondson from the case on July 15, 23 2020. ECF No. 58. Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by the remaining Defendants, 24 Kaylor and Pierce (collectively, “Defendants”). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant 25 law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 26…