Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Sharhan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20204:20-cv-00750California1,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No. 20-cv-00750-MMC RICHARD SEPULVEDA,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

DEFAULT; DENYING AS MOOT

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO

AHMED A. SHARHAN, DEFENDANT Defendant. Re: Doc. Nos. 11,

15 Before the Court is defendant Ahmed A. Sharhan’s (“Sharhan”) “Motion for Relief of Default Pursuant to CCP Section 473.5,” filed July 22, 2020, which the Court construes as a motion to set aside entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda (“Sepulveda”) has not filed opposition.1 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of the instant motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the moving papers, VACATES the hearing scheduled for August 28, 2020, and rules as follows. In his complaint, Sepulveda asserts claims under the Americans with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.