Demassa

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 18-cv-00043-MMC

P.C.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT 9 CHRIS DEMASSA, Re: Doc. Nos. 207, 214 10 Defendant.

11 Before the Court is defendant Chris DeMassa's second Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 23, 2020. Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows. BACKGROUND In the operative complaint, the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), plaintiff, a law firm, asserts three Claims for Relief against defendant, who, plaintiff alleges, is "not a licensed attorney" (see SAC ¶ 8) and "operates a number of different trademark preparation websites" (see SAC ¶ 2). …