SPRAWLDEF

SPRAWLDEF v. City of Richmond

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20204:18-cv-03918California2,710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SPRAWLDEF, ET AL., CASE NO. 18-cv-03918-YGR

Petitioners, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTION

vs. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

CITY OF RICHMOND, ET AL., Dkt. Nos. 103, 126 Respondents.

Petitioners Paul Carman, Citizens for East Shore Parks, James Hanson, SPRAWLDEF, Pamela Stello, and Tony Sustak bring the instant petition against respondents Mayor Tom Butt, City of Richmond, and Richmond City Council (collectively, “the City”). The petition alleges a violation of California’s Brown Act, Government Code §§ 54950 et seq. arising from approval of a settlement agreement and the resulting judgment in the underlying action, Guidiville Rancheria of Cal. v. United States of Am., Northern District of California Case No. 12-cv1326-YGR (“the Guidiville action”). Presently before the Court are two motions filed by petitioners: (1) A motion for preliminary injunction, filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.