Mai

Johnson v. Mai

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20205:19-cv-00827California657 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00827-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

RESPONSES; ORDER TO SHOW

CHI MAI, et al., CAUSE RE SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

On August 6, 2020, plaintiff Scott Johnson filed a discovery dispute letter asking the Court to compel pro se defendants Chi Mai, Kim Hang Thi Bui, and Hong Thuy Thi Hoang to respond to Mr. Johnson’s interrogatories and document requests. Dkt. No. 46. Mr. Johnson advised the Court that he filed the letter unilaterally because he could not obtain defendants’ cooperation in the joint discovery dispute resolution process outlined in the Court’s Standing Order for Civil Cases. Id. at 3. The Court ordered defendants to file a response to Mr. Johnson’s August 6, 2020 letter by August 14, 2020. Dkt. No. 47. Defendants did not comply with that order. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.