Nanometrics, Incorporated v. Optical Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20205:18-cv-00417California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 Lead Case No. 18-cv-00417-BLF OPTICAL SOLUTIONS Case No. 18-cv-03276-BLF

INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

NANOMETRICS INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

13 On June 23, 2020, this Court granted Defendant Nanometrics’s motion to dismiss 14 Plaintiff’s third amended complaint. See Order, ECF 87. Now—nearly two months later and more 15 than a month after Plaintiff filed its fourth amended complaint—before the Court is Defendant’s 16 motion for leave to file its motion for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss 17 the third amended complaint. See Mot., ECF 98. The Civil Local Rules provide that no response 18 need be filed and no hearing need be held with respect to a motion for leave to file a motion for 19 reconsideration. Civ. L.R. 7-9(d). 20 A motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.