Capolupo
Capolupo v. Eills
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CARRIE CAPOLUPO, Case No. 18-cv-07458-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
v. TO DISMISS
COUNTY OF HUMBOLT, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 82, 85 Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court are two Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s currently operative complaint.1 The first Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 82), filed by Humboldt County Sheriff’s Officers Allen, Hicks, Filippini, Wilcox, and Young (collectively referred to herein as “Officer Defendants”), seeks dismissal of the TAC (dkt. 62) without further leave to amend. The second Motion (dkt. 85) filed by County and Officer Defendants seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s Supplemental Third Amended Complaint (dkts. 83 and 62) without further leave to amend. Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 87) and Defendants have replied (dkt. 88). For the reasons stated below, Officer Defendant’s request for dismissal is denied and the County’s request for…