Perdomo

Perdomo v. Plumber

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20205:17-cv-06962California8,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS PERDOMO,

Case No. 17-06962 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

REFERRING CASE TO

WARDEN MUNTEZ, et al., SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS;

STAYING CASE; INSTRUCTIONS

Defendants. TO CLERK

(Docket No. 42)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Dkt. No. 1. The amended complaint is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 23-1. The Court found the amended complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment against Warden Muniz,1 Chief Deputy Warden R. Binkele, and Correctional Administrator E. Borla, and ordered Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.