Handloser

Handloser v. HCL America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20205:19-cv-01242California5,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GREGORY HANDLOSER, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01242-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

FIRST AND SECOND MOTIONS FOR

HCL AMERICA, INC., et al., DISCOVERY SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 77,

13 Plaintiffs Gregory Handloser and Cerafin Castillo have filed two motions for sanctions against defendants HCL America, Inc. and HCL Technologies, Ltd. (collectively “HCL”) for discovery-related misconduct. Dkt. Nos. 77, 91. Because the matters raised in these motions overlap to some extent, the Court considers the motions at the same time. The Court finds both motions suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motions for sanctions with respect to HCL’s failure to comply with portions of the Court’s November 25, 2019 order. The Court denies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.