Arakji

Arakji v. Microchip Technology, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20205:19-cv-02936California699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MAZEN ARAKJI, Case No. 19-cv-02936-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERAION

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC, [Re: ECF 74] Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Mazen Arakji’s has filed yet another “Objection” to one of the Court’s orders. 13 Plaintiff objects to this Court’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive 14 Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Cousins (ECF 73). ECF 74. The Court construes Plaintiff’s 15 “Objection” as a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration (“Motion”) pursuant to Civil 16 Local Rule 7-9. 17 A motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration may be filed prior to the entry of a 18 final judgment in the case. Civ. L.R. 7-9(a). “The moving party must specifically show reasonable 19 diligence in bringing the motion” and one of the following circumstances: 20 (1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.