Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20205:18-cv-04047California8,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 18-04047 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LOMU, et al., Defendants.

(Docket No. 46)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court found the amended complaint, Dkt. No. 151, stated a cognizable claim of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment against Defendants David Lomu and Zachary Copeland at the San Mateo County Jail, Maguire Correctional Facility (“MCF”), and ordered the matter served on Defendants. Dkt. No. 22. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that there are no genuine disputes of any material facts and they are entitled to qualified immunity. Dkt. No. 46.2

26 1 All page references herein are to the Docket pages shown in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.