Perdomo
Perdomo v. Plumber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLOS PERDOMO,
Case No. 17-06962 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS AS MOOT WARDEN MUNTEZ, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 51)
15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Dkt. No. 1. The amended complaint is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 23-1. The Court found the amended complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment against Warden Muniz, Chief Deputy Warden R. Binkele, and Correctional Administrator E. Borla, and ordered Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 26. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 42, which became fully briefed on April 14, 2020. Dkt. Nos. 47, 50. …