Mai

Johnson v. Mai

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20205:19-cv-00827California2,815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-00827-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

CHI MAI, et al., [Re: ECF 37] Defendants.

12 Serial litigator Scott Johnson (“Johnson”) brings this suit against Defendants Chi Mai, Kim Hang Thi Bui, and Hong Thuy Thi Hoang (“Defendants”), owners and proprietors of Sunflower Nails & Hair in San Jose. Johnson alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. See Compl., ECF 1. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief along with statutory damages. Id. Defendants did not respond to this motion and, save for a form answer to the complaint, have not participated in this litigation. See, e.g., Order Imposing Sanctions, ECF 34. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.