Pacific Recovery Solutions v. United Behavioral Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20204:20-cv-02249California7,274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02249 YGR PACIFIC RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, ET AL.,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

Plaintiffs, DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 39

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL.,

10 Defendants.

Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against defendants United Behavioral Health (“United”) and Viant, Inc. for claims arising out of United’s alleged failure to reimburse plaintiffs “a percentage” of the Usual, Customary, and Reasonable Rates (“UCR”) for Intensive Outpatient Program (“IOP”) services, which plaintiffs provided to patients with health insurance policies administered by United. In the complaint, plaintiffs assert, on their own behalf and on behalf of a proposed class of similarly-situated out-of-network IOP providers, claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), and multiple claims under California law. Now pending are two motions to dismiss all claims in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.