Hernandez

Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20203:19-cv-00817California571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division OMAR HERNANDEZ, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00817-EMC (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 66 DUTTON RANCH CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 16 The two named plaintiffs, who are migrant farmworkers who harvested grapes and apples for Dutton Ranch, sued Dutton individually and in a representative capacity for, among other claims, wage-and-hour violations, including a claim under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”).1 They dispute Dutton’s refusal to produce the PAGA group’s contact information and pay records: (1) the plaintiffs ask for production pursuant to a protective order, and (2) Dutton wants the court to send a Belaire notice (informing them of the lawsuit and providing an opportunity to opt out of having the plaintiffs’ counsel contact them).2 See Austin v. Foodliner, Inc., No. 16-cv-07185-HSG (DMR), 2018 WL 1168694, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2018) (citing

26 1 Third Am.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.