David Deluca v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20203:17-cv-00034California5,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID DELUCA, et al., Case No. 17-cv-00034-TSH

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT AND

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND COSTS

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 216, 217

13 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement. ECF Nos. 216, 217. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the September 10, 2020 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the Settlement Agreement and the Parties’ arguments and papers, the Court GRANTS both motions. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts Plaintiffs are former special investigators employed by Defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange (“Farmers”). ECF 146. Farmers is an inter-insurance exchange that sells homeowners insurance, auto insurance, commercial insurance, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.